| 于林轩,董锬.不同定标方法的多次通过试验结果分析[J].汽车零部件,2016,10(6):82-84 |
| 不同定标方法的多次通过试验结果分析 |
|
| |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 同种粉尘 不同定标方法 试验结果 对比分析 |
| 英文关键词: Same dust Different calibration method Test result Comparative analysis |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 3897 |
| 全文下载次数: 0 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 应用GJB-3820-1999和ISO-16889-2008两种标准对3种型号的滤材分别进行过滤性能检测，得出相应的试验结果，并对试验结果进行对比分析。试验采用的粉尘都是ISO MTD，不过定标方法不同，GJB 3820-1999标准中采用ACFTD粉尘进行标定，ISO-16889-2008标准中用ISO MTD粉尘进行标定。测得的试验结果整体上较为接近，能够很好地反映出滤材的过滤性能。这对于AC FTD粉尘停产之后，仍然采用GJB 3820 1999标准进行检测试验具有重要的意义。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Filtration performance tests of three types of filter medium with GJB 3820 1999 and ISO 16889 2008 standards were introduced and their test results were analyzed. ISO MTD dust was used in both tests while ACFTD dust was used in calibration of standard GJB 3820 1999 and ISO MTD dust was used in calibration of standard ISO 16889 2008. Test results are close overall with which filtration performance of filter materials can be reflect easily.It is important to use standard GJB 3820 1999 in the test since AC FTD dust is discontinued. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
